BILL O’REILLY ON OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE

4 12 2008

Update: A newly discovered Obama’s birth announcement, published in the Honolulu Advertizer periodical, might make the case more difficult to prove for those who still don’t want to believe that Obama is a natural born citizen.

According to Wikileaks, the Honolulu Advertiser announced Barack Obama’s Aug 4, 1961 birth. It was published on August 13, 1961 on page B-6. It is available only on microfilm in Hawaii libraries. You could see a photocopy of the microfilm by clicking on this link. The announcement is the 4th from the bottom of the left hand column.

The Oxford American Dictionary defines obsession as a noun, which means a state of being obsessed with someone or something or an idea or thought that continually preoccupies or intrudes on a person’s mind. The latter is the best explanation to those who still believe that Obama’s birth certificate is not real. However, for those that need images and voices to understand and grasp reality, the following video of Bill O’reilly should help them in relinquishing their obsession.


« »


Actions

Information

9 responses

19 11 2008
Marianne (11:44:10) :

I agree with him. I have never seen a real birth certificate for Obama.

It should be Obama’s “obsession” to comply with a normal request for legitimate information, and not force people to repeatedly ask him for something simple…..

Reply
21 11 2008
MoniQue (01:06:23) :

O we believe Obama’s birth certificate is real, just not a certificate of live birth for the State of Hawaii.

If Obama did in fact have a certificate of live birth for the State of Hawaii he would show it, but he won’t BECAUSE HE DOESN’T HAVE ONE.

Your definition of obsession is correct, however, your application of it towards those who are seeking the truth is incorrect.

Nice try at propaganda though.

Missing from your argument is the fact that most of the greatest minds and inventors were men obsessed with an idea or thought that continually preoccupied their mind, Albert Einstein to name one, who obesessed with his ideas until he came up with the theory of relativity. Newton, another. And basically every great artist.

So obsession is not inherently bad as you imply it is some sickness. It is only becomes sick when it has no reason. Not in this case here, as there is plenty of reason Obama is not a natural born US citizen. And the fact is that Obama will not prove himself. Of course, anyone with even minimal capability of thought can deduce that if he could, he simply would.

But he cannot so he will not.

On the contrary, your implications of obsession best fits to describe those who are so smitten and obsessed with Obama that they don’t even want to know the truth.

Reply
21 11 2008
jorgipogi (12:59:19) :

It is a obsession because even if he presents a real birth certificate, you will say that it is a fake one. There lies the difference. Hawaii officials have said that they have inspected the original certificate in their possession and talk to its originality. He was the son of an American woman what else you need. McCain was born in Panama and I don’t see you arguing his integrity.

Reply
21 11 2008
Marianne (17:27:13) :

McCain was different. He presented all his paperwork upon request.

Obama has refused to do so.

We see no proof that what Obama has is real, and indicates he was born in USA. If he was born of an American, in another country, he has to go through the naturalization process.

My brother had to do this. He was born in Libya, when my father was stationed there in the military.

Since Hawaii is a blue state, it would help to have several people examine the paperwork to be objective.

Also, you can be born outside the USA, and then get a certificate when you return. But you are not officially a citizen until you are naturalized.

There appears to be conflicting paperwork saying that Obama was born in Kenya. That is the reason for the inquiry. His mother may not have understood the rules, since she was so young.

The supreme court hearing for this is Dec 1st, I think. We will let the judges decide. Since you like Obama, hope things go in his direction.

Reply
21 11 2008
jorgipogi (19:02:57) :

It is not about liking Obama. It is about seeing thing for what they are. I wish the Supreme Court goes through with it and makes him reveal the birth certificate.

When it happens, and is demonstrated that he is a Natural born citizen, the same people are going to say that he still is not a natural born citizen because he spent time in indonesia, and therefore, must had relinquish his US citizenship. Then, they will go to Indonesia to see if his mother did relinquish her citizenship and they will say no and then something else will be brought up.

It never ends. But, I like it because give us things to talk about it.

Reply
21 11 2008
jorgipogi (19:03:38) :

It will never end..

Reply
21 11 2008
jorgipogi (19:04:05) :

There lies the difference between good obsession and bad obsession…

Reply
5 12 2008
Marianne (19:34:41) :

hi jorgipogi

Well, personally , I hope Obama is legitimate, not because I like him, but because this sort of thing is stressful for all concerned. Our country is so fragile right now, with every bit of negative news sending the market into a plunge. We need some positive news for a change.

marianne

Reply
7 12 2008
The Intellectual Redneck (12:38:23) :

This is the most thoughtful and coherent comment I have read on this issue. I wish I had written this comment. This writer goes to he heart of the issue and does it in a very unbiased way.

Really? (#129849)
by Hank Rand on December 6, 2008 at 9:44 PM
“What difference does it make to the future of this country whether Obama was born on US soil? Advocates of this destructive campaign will argue that the Constitutional principle regarding the qualifications for President trumps all others. But how viable will our Constitution be if 5 Supreme Court justices should decide to void 64 million ballots?”

A proponent of the reality that there is an outstanding question that exists relating to Barack Obama’s natural born citizenship (not that I have an answer, but rather simply that no answer has been given), my personal opinion is that this has less to do with the merit of this particular Constitutional law…and more to do with the character and integrity of a man who may have gone to such great lengths to, knowingly, break it. And in that course of action, our entire country (not just those who didn’t vote for him) and our most coveted process of Democracy (our vote), were defrauded.

If he’s found to be ineligible per the Constitution, proving he knowingly and willfully defrauded our people and process, it won’t be the Justices who will have disenfranchised 64 million voters. It’s Barack Obama. How many times are you prepared to claim “you fell down the stairs” for this man? I was an initial supporter. I started seeing very real and very questionable issues raised about the nature of his past associations, and the laughable explanations he would give…and I was sure it would hurt him in the press and among supporters. But what did I see? The press and most supporters to engrossed in their partisanship to care. In fact, the more reasonable questions came up about him…the harder the press and the 64 million that same press brainwashed, drove to the hoop for him. As I stood back watching this, again, as an initial supporter of his, even making phone calls on his behalf…I realized what I was seeing, was nothing short of WEIRD. Just, plain, weird.

And I thought this birth certificate issue (check that, “Certificate of Live Birth” issue…as opposed to “Certification of Live Birth”) was cleared up a long time ago. I thought there was no way the DNC would have been capable of such a gross oversight. Then the court cases came up, and nothing was done to quell the question. What finally landed me understanding that something is not right, is when Chiyome Fukino, Director of Health for Hawaii, released the statement about his birth. That statement actually did more harm than good, and it only demonstrated further how moronic far too many public officials and people in the media and governing bodies, think Americans are.

Sure, America has it’s slew of idiots. And sure, the aisle that questions Barack Obama’s natural born and/or properly maintained citizenship statuses has it’s smattering of fringe wingnuts. But just because one contingent of people happen to be on board, doesn’t nullify the fact that the question is still outstanding. I hear the same 5 refutations over, and over, and over. “He posted his birth certificate on his website”, “Factcheck proved it”, “The state of Hawaii released a statement saying he was born there”, “There was a birth announcement in a Hawaiian newspaper”, “Judges meritoriously threw it out as ‘frivolous’”; and while each of those statements hold an element of truth, they’re also easily debunked. And “truth” is objective. There is no debunking it. We should be able to move past this on to more subjective and productive lines of communication…with all the dissent we’re accustomed to…forging, like competition, improvement. But here we are. And one man can answer this objective question. And sure, not everyone will get on board if he were to release his college records and actual Certificate of Live Birth (as opposed to the factually less credible, more easily attained and more easily forged “Certification” – which bears no corroborating evidence like the hospital or doctor’s name)…but many would get on board. Coming off a platform of transparency, directly in to a promised pursuit for unity…why leave so many of us divided on what is a simple and objectively debunked question? If the Certification is authentic, the it’s more credible parent – the Certificate, exists. But rather than produce it, he has fought those requests so fiercely that he’s allowed the same requests to land in court rooms…where he continues to fight them. Why? So rather than quell the reasonable, objective and easily answered outstanding question…he opts non disclosure. I wrote somewhere else that the production of Certificate of Live Birth is a very small price t pay for unity. And yet, here we are. And Barack Obama, and Barack Obama only, is responsible for that. I am certain of that beyond any reasonable doubt, because Barack Obama, and Barack Obama only, can quell it…with an actual Certificate of Live Birth, and he has watched requests transition to court cases, and still refuses. So as a first order of business, in a promised pursuit for unity, he leaves us divided, on what should be a very simple, very objective, very basic matter. Who among us can applaud that? “I do, Hank. Because you’re all just whackjobs.” That’s all well and good if that’s your opinion. My brother said to me, “Yeah but if we pull him out, we’re going to look corrupt to the rest of the world.” I replied, “I’d rather look corrupt and not be it, than be corrupt and not look it.” So goes my position on being called a whackjob, for maintaining through nothing more than logic and fact, that there is a still outstanding question regarding Barack Obama’s natural born and properly maintained citizenship statuses. I’d rather be called a whackjob and stand by truth, than submit to mistruths and be called sound.

I didn’t hear any of the 5 standard press talking points in your piece, which leads me to believe the transition I anticipated is occurring. That is, virtually all of supporters (and I don’t know if you were one prior to November 4th or not), will go from, “He didn’t commit fraud. He is a natural born citizen”, to “So what if he committed fraud. So what if he isn’t a natural born citizen.” I’ve challenged others, staunch supporters in fact, as to whether or not they’d concede a gross misstep in character and judgement, and support his being held accountable for that, if he did commit this fraud. They’ve uniformly claimed they would. This article, blog, whatever it is…demonstrates the first piece I’ve actually seen that goes out of it’s way to say, “No. I wouldn’t. Barack Obama can lie, cheat and steal all he wants. And if he gets held accountable for it, it’s the fault of the Justices…because Barack Obama himself, is simply incapable of wrongdoing.”

Running that red light you sit at, day after day, when no one is looking, is pretty harmless too. But you know it’s wrong. This man, if not a natural born and properly maintained citizen of the United States, will have knowingly and willfully cheated our entire country, and more critical than that – our absolutely, inherently, unquestionably most coveted process of democracy – in what can only be articulated as a relentless pursuit for unapologetic, integrity-free, and division-inducing pursuit for power.Link.

The Intellectual Redneck

Reply

Leave a comment